TechPractices are outstanding housing projects throughout the U.S. where innovative technologies are implemented. Builders and remodelers can use these examples as models for projects of their own.
| The Grove at Patuxent Woods Snapshot |
| Location: |
Patuxent City, MD |
| Builder: |
Southern Maryland Tri-County Community Action Committee, Inc. |
| Project Scope: |
7 units; single-family detached two-story houses on attached sites |
| Price:
| Average $72,500 |
| Financing: |
Competition-winner financed by state, non-profit development, federal mortgage program, rural development grant, and utility rebate |
| Innovations: |
Shared Wastewater Treatment System, Pressure Treated Wood Foundations, Geothermal Heat Pumps, Optimum Value Engineering |
Summary
What do you do when you're stuck with a site that can't handle
the septic load? Well, in this project for seven affordable houses,
it was possible to concentrate shared
wastewater treatment systems in areas of the site with adequate
soil conditions, allowing four houses to route their septic to
a fifth lot, while two other houses shared a septic field. Other
innovations worth considering here are pressure-treated permanent
wood foundations to minimize site disturbance and eliminate the
added cost of concrete work; optimum
value-engineered framing that saves material; and geothermal
heat pumps that tap into the earth's steady underground temperature,
to reduce utility bills.
Details
This competition-winning design for a small development in
a depressed part of rural Maryland contains seven houses on land
that was previously considered unbuildable-every developer's nightmare.
Percolation tests revealed that the soil conditions could not
support development.


The development is clustered to reduce costly service runs, such
as roads and sewer, by keeping the houses close to the road and
preserving the far lot as common open space. A buffer lot between
the clusters accommodates a community play area and one of the
wastewater recovery areas, across the road. The road was designed
for private maintenance so that it could be narrower, less extensively
engineered, paved with pervious materials, and cheaper than county
standards. Aligning the septic system with the road allowed a
single excavation. Both the road and the septic is owned in common.
The sloping site, coupled with the dry, sandy soil, made the
wood foundations feasible. The combination of methods used to
keep costs down is clearly innovative, but the individual technologies
are tested, economical, and widely available.
A two-ton geothermal unit is installed in each 1,100 sq. ft.
home. The vertical, closed loop system works with a ground-source
heat pump that takes advantage of steady undergroundtemperatures.
In a climate like Maryland which is neither excessively hot nor
cold, a ground-source heat pump makes sense. The average temperature
200 feet underground is 57°F, within the acceptable range for
heating and cooling heat transfer, allowing the soil to serve
as a heat sink or heat source for both heating and cooling. In
the summer, a heat pump water heater function provides domestic water heating
from the air conditioner's waste heat.
Installation/Construction
Wood foundations have a few things worth considering: they
eliminate the need for concrete on site and allow for fast construction,
yet qualify for a conventional mortgage. Poured gravel is used
instead of a concrete footing.
The geothermal system requires a well driller to bore 6 inch diameter holes 200 feet deep for vertical pipe installation. The holes
are then sealed with bentonite, a good heat transfer material.
A flow center is installed inside the house to recirculate the
glycol heat exchange solution. The utility rebate program requires
that home registration and inspection be coordinated with construction
phasing, especially for the geothermal installation.
Benefits/Costs
The design team approached the developer with the suggestion
that the project be designed for a state-sponsored competition
for affordable housing. The project was one of two selected for
recognition, which allowed partial state financing. Additional
funds are provided by a non-profit county housing provider, a
federal mortgage program, and a rural development grant. Costs
are cut through efficient space planning, the wood foundations,
the value-engineered framing system, and the narrow road. As a
result, these houses average $72,500, which is 45% of the reported
median house price for the area.
The shared septic system was the most economical way to allow
this site to be developed. Homeowners will need some training
in maintenance procedures to deal with the commonly-owned road
and septic. The geothermal heat pumps are expected to reduce utility
costs, especially when combined with boosted insulation standards
required by the Southern Maryland Electric Cooperative (SMECO).
SMECO offered a rebate of $3,500 per home through the Power Saver
Home temporary rebate program for choosing a geothermal system.
SMECO is now developing a full-service Energy
Star Homes Program that can prescribe components and analyze
building systems to help the builder meet Energy Star requirements.
Good for temperate climates, geothermal systems may not be
cost-effective for southern regions where the ground is too warm.
In the installation at the Grove, the transfer solution never
climbs above 80° in summer, so the amount of pipe needed is
not excessive. No furnace is needed because the liquid solution
never dips below 40° in winter, and a cold winter results
in energy savings the following summer. First cost of the geothermal
system is somewhat higher than a comparable electric heat pump,
but energy savings will eventually pay for increased installation
costs. According to energy modeling comparing the geothermal system
to an efficient air-to-air heat pump system, yearly electrical
savings are $304. Increased maintenance intervals save another
$75 per year. Without a condenser, there is no outdoor unit to
get beat up or vandalized. According to the installer, the key
to a cost-effective installation is designing the loop with the
proper amount of wells and piping.
Code/Regulatory
Charles county offered the site to the non-profit housing provider
with the understanding that the sewage regulations might be relaxed.
The county agreed to allow sewage from four lots to be conveyed
to a fifth and from one lot to the adjacent lot where percolation
rates were acceptable. Still, the shared wastewater system caused
delays, taking almost a year to be approved.
Feedback
The lending agency requires that houses not be built until
a qualifying buyer is located. So far, four houses have been built,
with a fifth under construction. The entire development should
be finished up by winter 1999. The clustered development is different
from the conventional, low-density zoning in the area. But it's
a lot better than the slum conditions that preceded it.
Contact(s)
Do you have a specific question? Try the contacts listed below:
Bennett Frank McCarthy Architects, Inc.
7003 Carroll Ave.
Takoma Park, MD 20912
301-270-9480
Southern Maryland Tri-County Community Action Committee, Inc.
P.O. Box 280
Hughesville, MD 20637
301-274-4474
mike@smtccac.org
Southern Maryland Electric Cooperative
Power Saver Home Program
P.O. Box 1937
Hughesville, MD 20637
301-274-4338
www.smeco.com